
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Visioneers &#187; evaluation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliveragustin.com/tag/evaluation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliveragustin.com</link>
	<description>Tech, IT, Security, Research, Trends and  Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rice quality evaluation</title>
		<link>http://www.oliveragustin.com/automatic-milled-rice-quality-evaluation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliveragustin.com/automatic-milled-rice-quality-evaluation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whaldsz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milled Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight estimation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliveragustin.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prior to the previous post, I also finished a paper entitled &#8220;Automatic milled rice quality evaluation&#8221; that&#8217;s about to appear in one international conference proceedings.  The idea is to build a low-cost, efficient, and reliable alternative for the milled rice quality evaluation.  As you know, some rice quality standards require the grading factors or defectives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to the previous post, I also finished a paper entitled &#8220;Automatic milled rice quality evaluation&#8221; that&#8217;s about to appear in one international conference proceedings.  The idea is to build a low-cost, efficient, and reliable alternative for the milled rice quality evaluation.  As you know, some rice quality standards require the grading factors or defectives in terms weight (grams) , making this problem a very challenging and interesting one!  Read on, some results are discussed in the succeeding paragraphs.</p>
<p>This is the block diagram of the milled rice quality evaluation system, comprised of 6 different stages.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/framework.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-18" title="Quality evaluation framework for milled rice" src="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/framework-300x174.jpg" alt="automatic milled rice evaluation framework" width="304" height="176" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-16"></span>Sample milled rice image is shown below, (a) acquired from scanner and (b) background-segmented image.  It is important that unnecessary objects are removed prior to further image processing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/background_removed_with_label.bmp"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-17" title="Milled rice image" src="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/background_removed_with_label.bmp" alt="Acquired image and background-segmented image" width="298" height="156" /></a></p>
<p>These are the segmented kernel images prior to features extraction.  Different types of kernels are obviously visible, paddy, chalky, damaged, broken, good/sound kernels.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/segmented_kernels.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-19" title="Segmented rice kernels" src="http://www.oliveragustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/segmented_kernels-300x97.jpg" alt="Different milled rice kernel segmented images" width="300" height="97" /></a></p>
<p>We then use the extracted features from the above kernel images to classify according to defective types.  The result is then processed to determine the estimated weight.  Finally, based on these estimates, we judge according to rice quality standards of course, whether the rice is premium grade, grade 1, grade 2, etc.  The result in terms of weight estimates were quite exceptional and the classification, too!  However, I&#8217;m still looking for a much better approach that gives better accuracy.  I built my classifier using probabilistic neural network (PNN).  And oh, I developed this system in C#.</p>
<p>Any better suggestion for improving my regression and classifier?  I welcome your comments and suggestions&#8230;.</p>
<p style="white-space:nowrap"><img style="border:0px" src="http://tarpipe.com/img/tarpipe.png" />&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://tarpipe.com/share/?t=Rice+quality+evaluation&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oliveragustin.com%2Fautomatic-milled-rice-quality-evaluation%2F&b=Reading %22Rice+quality+evaluation%22">Share now!</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliveragustin.com/automatic-milled-rice-quality-evaluation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

